Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:22:58 +0000 From: Alun <[email protected]> To: Oliver Seitz <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [jallib] Advice regarding variable access from interrupt routines [Also here for the list] On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:05:04 -0800 (PST) Oliver Seitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just imagine, routine 2 always writes shortly after routine 1 does. > The value of routine 1 will never be read back, the easiest way then > would be not to implement routine 1 at all. Well that would certainly save some time :-) Thanks for your thoughts. I was worried I might be missing some simple way to bypass the difficulty. It's easy enough to build, by hand, safe access for each specific case but, if I submit a library called "safe_concurrent_access.jal" and it's not safe under all conditions I'm sure someone will manage to trigger corruption and, rightly enough, call it a bug in the library. Cheers, Alun. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
