On 3-02-13 14:19, Oliver Seitz wrote:
Well, serial_hw_int_cts and serial_hw2_int_cts have very similar names,
serve very similar purposes, share a common API, but looked very
different at their source code. Having in mind that hw3 and hw4 are soon
to be done, I thought it would be good to have the code to look alike as
possible.
First make it work, then beautify....
And in my opinion my hw2 library looked better than the hw library: no
deprecated stuff, etc. So why didn't you beautify that in stead of
creating a new one? You introduced error(s) and released an untested
library!
I've never reverted anything before, would have to find out how... You
can do it, if you like. Thanks.
I never reverted either, but I'll try it and also try to fix the
library. But I'm not happy with this!
Regards, Rob.
--
R. Hamerling, Netherlands --- http://www.robh.nl
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
