I am interested, but I don't live across the street so it would be costly to get there.
Matt. On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:49:43 AM UTC-5, Kiste wrote: > > "Having a complete package is a good thing." > > This is true. But the world is not static. There is 16-bit PWM now. There > is 8-bit DAC. There is floating-point math. Neither of which is supportet > by jallib, IMO. > > Advertising by posting projects in the web is a way, and an easy one. It > is one, however, which many people go. I'd like to repeat the proposal I've > made before: Soon is the time to apply for a gratis open-source-project > booth at http://www.linuxtag.org/2014/en/ . > > If someone is going to help a little in any way, I'm prepared to put quite > some effort in such a project. I'm familiar with trade fairs and I can > reach the location by subway. > > I even have some hundred old PCBs as giveaways, which can be used for > MAX232 level converters. I can laser-cut the jallib URL onto those PCBs. > > I have touch sensors and a LED-tile with 40 RGB-LEDs as exhibits. > > Is anyone even a little interested? > > ------------------------------ > *Von:* mattschinkel <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *An:* [email protected] <javascript:> > *Gesendet:* 2:19 Mittwoch, 19.Februar 2014 > *Betreff:* [jallib] Re: jallib team > > Hi Rob, > The team has done a great job with the package we have created. It seems > that Jallib is mostly complete, which causes less commits. Having a > complete package is a good thing. > I and others just don't have time lately, although I do plan to get back > into it and write more tutorials and put more work into bits of my current > libs. When I was writing the tutorials and posting about them on Jallist > and elsewhere, it was good advertising. This seemed to produce new interest. > You are a huge contributor at the moment. We all greatly appreciate the > work you put into the device files. I'm not sure how to word this, but if > you look at the amount of work you are putting in, and compare it to the > number of other committers/users, it seems like you are doing too much for > the "worth" of the additional device files. I think the answer is no, but > is there any way to automate your device file creation? It may be more > efficient to put your work in elsewhere. You could also choose to only > update device files once per year, or whenever there is a need to do so do > too a request. I don't think people use these new device files much. > I think we need to think up new projects and idea's, and you could assist > better here. Maybe start a large project as a group and try to build > something crazy that can get attention. > Some examples of things that could help, please add. > 1. Help Kyle with the compiler to get new devices to work with it to get > interest in the language. > 2. Help Kyle with the compiler to make Jalv2 a cool scripting language for > linux/windows. will need a new set of libs, and therefore more commits. > 3. Work on whatever lib needs the most work. I'd say that would be the > GLCD libs. Do a complete rewrite? > 4. Start a project.. Send Jallib to space? Start an AI project? Build a > robot? > 5. Publish a book > > Matt. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <javascript:> > . > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
