SPI or ISP? :) It may be best to keep a log of device file issues, since nobody has taken the responsibility of updating them.
Matt. On Sunday, August 24, 2014 3:32:54 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > > Status: New > Owner: robhamerling > Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-External Component-Device > > New issue 198 by robhamerling: Missing var bit*4 SSPxCON1 in several > device > files > https://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=198 > > Of the current device files several PICs with MSSP module (e.d.16f1947) > lack the var bit*4 SSPCON1_SSPM (and aliases when multiple MSSP modules > are > present). Thus the ISP libraries cannot be used with these chips (and also > > not with other libraries using the ISP libraries as underlying vehicle for > > communications with external devices like temperature sensors, etc.). > The ISP libraries might be improved by using the enumerated SSPM bits when > > the unenumerated SSPM variable is not present. > > > -- > You received this message because this project is configured to send all > issue notifications to this address. > You may adjust your notification preferences at: > https://code.google.com/hosting/settings > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
