Hi Rob, You may open an issue for this at Github. Hopefully someone will assist with fixing the device files.
Matt. On Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 9:47:42 AM UTC-4, RobH wrote: > > > I've added to Github experimental device files for the 16[l]f18313/323, > just to show the differences in naming conventions of the ADC pins > (compared to the 'old' naming) and how these device files may provide > working aliases for the ADC libraries. Hopefully someone has time to > have a look and comment..... > Rob. > > On 2015-07-24 17:22, Rob Hamerling wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > In the datasheet of the 16f18313/23 I found that ADC pins are > > differently named/numbered than before (ANx aliases are not anymore > > sequentially named). For example with the 16f18323 AN3 is not present > > while AN4 and AN5 are. AN6 to 15 are not present while AN16 to 21 are > > present. > > Note that the aliases in are in the datasheet really named ANAx and > > ANCx, corresponding the port/pin. > > > > In the part we adopted "JANSELx" alias naming of the ADC pins > > corresponding to the channel number. If we want to continue this we > > would get in this case JANSEL0,1,2,4,5 and JANSEL16,17,18,19,20,21. > > Seems the way to go, but I do not know if the ADC libraries would work > > this way for these PICs. > > > > Comments and suggestions are welcome! > > > > Regards, Rob. > > > > -- > *Rob H*amerling - http://www.robh.nl > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
