Hi Vasi, >Lets bring all the people on linux, unix and equivalents! Now is the time.
Good idea! And, while we're at it, we can go that little further and make peace on earth, stop all pollution, end all diseases and transform all of those terrible dogs to nice cats. </sarcasm> I've had a quick look at the compiler source, but it's a very long and complicated text in a foreign language to me... Yet, I presume adding a PRAGMA to allow multiple includes is more than tricky. I doubt if a PRAGMA can even find out in which file it is declared. So, my favourite options are still 1. One library and four symlinks (and symlinks do exist on windows) 2. Four libraries, each doing one array 3. Four identical libraries, wasting some disk space Linux is not saint, and windows is not evil. It's just another OS, we have to live with it. Greets, Kiste P.S.: Still, there's a joke coming to my mind... Microsoft once warned from using free software for warranty reasons. Free software is written by thousonds of little-known people around the world, there's noone you can get hold of to guarantee that everything works flawless. While for the windows products, you know that is is the big company Microsoft that doesn't guarantee that everything works flawless. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/456964673.2895106.1608536645986%40mail.yahoo.com.
