Hi Kiste, as far as I read my version of k50 (PIC18F25k50) does not have
ECCP it in 28 pin, I have to stick on my available stock of
microcontrollers during the inexistence at this point (Farnell, TME) of too
many options to buy immediately PIC microcontrollers.
Thanks for your solution, I think I will do it in interrupts using TMR0 for
a short timebase, count it for the needed frequency and toggle the output
pins.
Yes, indeed a CLC would be helpful with the standard CCP...
best wishes,

On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 5:48 PM 'Oliver Seitz' via jallib <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Well... almost all 28pin? Chips with suffixes like k20, k22, k50, k80,
> j11, j13, j50 and j80 do have ECCP, chips with suffixes like q40, q41, q43,
> q83, q84, k42, k83 and numerous more have CWG and/or CLC modules, which
> both allow the generation of those signals using a simple PWM.
>
>
> With the PIC18F2550, I only have one idea... Externally feed the pmw
> signal back to pins A0 and A1, set the CVRef module to somewhere in the
> middle, set comparator mode 0b110, and set one of the CxINV bits. Then you
> have the symmetric signals on C1out and C2out. It's not the most elegant
> solution, I admit...
>
> Greets,
> Kiste
>
>
>
> Am Sonntag, 1. August 2021, 14:58:43 MESZ hat vsurducan <
> [email protected]> Folgendes geschrieben:
>
>
>
>
>
> Thx Rob, the bridge mode (enhanced CCP) works only for a 40 pin device, I
> have a 28 pin device on my board. Enhanced CCP is available only on large
> size microcontroller. :(   Almost all 28 pin microcontrollers suffer from
> this issue (PIC18F25k50, etc.)
> Since I need two signals with opposite phases, 50% duty cycle, whose
> frequency should be programmable between 1KHz and 2KHz I think they can be
> generated in compare mode...or perhaps in software.  I also need to trigger
> an ADC read during the high level of those pulses from time to time.
>
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 2:17 PM Rob CJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >  Hi Vasile,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  Not sure if I understood you correctly. If you want the PWM signals to
> be exactly the same but only inverted you can use the bridge mode for one
> of the PWM's that is when one output goes high the other goes low.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  Kind regards,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  Rob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens vsurducan
> <[email protected]>
> > Verzonden: zondag 1 augustus 2021 10:14
> > Aan: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Onderwerp: [jallib] PWM versus enhanced PWM, oposite polarity output?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > PIC18F2550, 28pin PIC device has only the PWM implemented, the enhanced
> PWM is available on 40/44pin devices only. However, If I want on a 28pin
> PIC  two PWMs running at the same frequency, with the same duty-cycle, how
> can I generate one active high and one active low PWM signals without using
> any external inverter? No deadband between the output signals is required.
> >
> > Any experience is appreciated.
> >
> > thank you!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "jallib" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/CAM%2Bj4qvHSZrsUtoF_1GcDrNS2_mup_hc5ZbYOuQu4uGw5TYuAQ%40mail.gmail.com
> .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "jallib" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/AM0PR07MB624142E76C9FF412EBE22FC5E6EE9%40AM0PR07MB6241.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
> .
> >
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/CAM%2Bj4qstLOMHMLtJcLLEfywQ_%2BTYOWzEUCkLtghwrskyk%3DO%3DAg%40mail.gmail.com
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/592117056.1109097.1627829331026%40mail.yahoo.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/CAM%2Bj4quga9W%2B1gNP1UFBJDR8cJM04eh24ecHRR8%2BA5uOcnC4Yw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to