Different speeds?Different pullup values?Long lines? Hardware as slave, Software as master?Personal preference?
Gesendet von Yahoo Mail auf Android Am Mo., Feb. 14, 2022 at 8:21 schrieb vsurducan<[email protected]>: Hi all,Would be interesting to find why it uses both types of i2c. From pure hw perspective, once you have an i2c bus, you can expand it as much you want by changing it's base address with a buffer/expander. Perhaps the user did not knew this. On Sun 13 Feb 2022, 11:47 PM Matthew Schinkel <[email protected] wrote: Hi Rob, I agree. Change the i2c library variable and procedure names in both libs. If there are any libraries using the i2c lib, they should not need to be changed. Instead, add aliases in the samples like what I've done for serial in many samples. In 18f4620_sd_card.jal:-- some aliases so it is easy to change from serial hw to serial sw. alias serial_write is serial_hw_write alias serial_read is serial_hw_read alias serial_data is serial_hw_data alias serial_data_available is serial_hw_data_available This allows the user to switch between hardware and software libraries, or use both. I don't think there is any need for a legacy library when the user can just add some alias lines to their sample. They'll need to change their sample either way. Thanks,Matt. On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 1:04:18 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: Hi all, I got an e-mail from a Jallib user who wants to use both IIC software and IIC hardware. This is, however, not possible because both libraries use the same names in procedures and functions. For USART the convention 'sw', 'hw' and 'hw2' is used in the procedures. The problem is easily fixed by adding _sw_ to the software iic procedures. I did this for this Jallib member and gave him a modified version of i2c_software. But when changing this and adding this to Jallib then all sample files that use i2c_software should be changed and members that have made projects with this library should modify their programs too. Next to that, for consistency, the i2c_hardware should also get the addition (in procedure names) _hw_. What do you think? Should this be changed and if so, how? Thanks. Kind regards, Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/1525e85a-c620-474a-8423-24751c38359cn%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/CAM%2Bj4quBQ6zYMa6X7WjsXvT1LJAbs76wS83fy_gwCE7n2P6AGQ%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/836744923.641527.1644823674183%40mail.yahoo.com.
