Hi Hans,

Good to hear. Because your PIC runs at 4 MHz you should indeed use the lower 
bitrate.

Kind regards,
Rob

Met vriendelijke groet,
Rob Jansen
________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of hans 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2022 11:46:40 AM
To: jallib <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [jallib] 12F617_virtual_wire_transmitter/receiverrework for a 
16F648a

Hi Rob
Great, I have taken out the selection and forced both to the low bitrate and it 
works.
Thanks
regards
Hans

Op zondag 19 juni 2022 om 08:18:20 UTC+2 schreef [email protected]:
Hi Hans,

I could not see something wrong in the code, except that the bitrate 
calculation is not correct because your PIC runs at 4 MHz instead of 8 MHz but 
that would not be a problem since it is the same for the transmitter and the 
receiver.

So what is not working? Did you try to connect the output of the transmitter 
directly to the input of the receiver to test if that works (so without an RF 
module)?

Another question. This sample program assumes that the transmitter and receiver 
have an input to select a high or low bitrate. Since you disabled the weak 
pull-up in  your program (your PIC does not have this on all pins) these pins 
are floating so it is not sure what is selected as bitrate. It could then 
happen that the transmitter is using a high bitrate and the receiver a low 
bitrate (or the other way around or even a random behaviour) and that will not 
work. So my suggestion is to use pull-up resistors on the input pin or at least 
connect them to ground or VCC and selecting the same bitrate on both sides.

Kind regards,

Rob

________________________________
Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens hans 
<[email protected]>
Verzonden: zaterdag 18 juni 2022 18:46
Aan: jallib <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: [jallib] 12F617_virtual_wire_transmitter/receiverrework for a 16F648a

Hello all,
Here I am again. I have tried to adapt the example program : 
12F617_virtual_wire_transmitter/receiver for a 16F648a. Even though the 
compilation doesn't throw any errors, the case doesn't work. Do any of you have 
the time and inclination to take a look at it?
  Thanks again for the umpteenth time.
Hans

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/8fa787a0-5cb5-4951-8467-76fe8ed5c891n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/8fa787a0-5cb5-4951-8467-76fe8ed5c891n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/38f54ae9-03a5-4418-97a2-2c0ae8072eb0n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/38f54ae9-03a5-4418-97a2-2c0ae8072eb0n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/GVXP195MB1637DD3FF1ECE61A1656633AE6B19%40GVXP195MB1637.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.

Reply via email to