Hi,

Thanks Rob.

I had a look in the 16F1705.pic file, and indeed, it seems impossible to 
calculate the exact offset for the start of the HEF area.....

Anyway, thanks for the info: I learned a lot !

Kind regards,

David


Le dimanche 23 octobre 2022 à 19:11:42 UTC+2, [email protected] a écrit :

> Hi David,
>
> The XML files are provided by Mircochip if you download MPLABX.
>
> If we would want to use the ROM code size (which is known from the XML) it 
> woule be possible to add something like this to the compiler functionality:
>
> *      target_code_size *
>
> So in your program you would have something like:
>
> const HEF_OFFSET_ADDRESS = target_code_size - HEF_NR_OF_BYTES (or just 
> minus 128).
>
> I attached the XML for your PIC.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rob
>
> ------------------------------
> *Van:* [email protected] <[email protected]> namens 
> [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Verzonden:* zondag 23 oktober 2022 16:48
> *Aan:* jallib <[email protected]>
> *Onderwerp:* Re: [jallib] HEF usage: One suggestion and one question 
>  
> Just another thought:   
> In the device include file of older PIC's with dedicated eeprom, I see  a 
> directive defining that eeprom, by adress and size.
> For example, for a 16F628A : 
> pragma  eeprom           0x2100,256
>
> Is this the kind of info you retrieve from the XML files ?
> For my information, where could I see the content of such a XML file (say 
> the one for the 16F1705 I use) ?
>
>
>
> Le dimanche 23 octobre 2022 à 16:38:42 UTC+2, [email protected] a 
> écrit :
>
> We asked Microchip for the information.  We are Microchip Approved 
> Software Partners so we can ask for key information. 
>
> This information was the used to populate the PIckit parts database.
>
> ------
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of 
> [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 23, 2022 3:35:36 PM
> *To:* jallib <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [jallib] HEF usage: One suggestion and one question 
>  
> Thanks all for those creative answers
>
> @Rob : Indeed, using one HEF location as an indicator to know if the 
> settings have already been initialised or not was my fallback solution.   
> As you explain (and I wasn't aware of that), if you do not receive the 
> value in the XML from Microchip, you can not put that value in the include 
> file....  unfortunately.
>
> About the discussion to deduce the offset by assuming the HEF size is 
> always 128 bytes, that seems very risky to me.   Furthermore, in the 
> document Rob H linked, there are already a bunch of PIC's for which that 
> size is not at all 128 bytes.....
>
> I do not know what data is included in the Microchip XML files, but how 
> does the programmers (ICD, PicKit, ....)  know how much HEF there is ?   Or 
> do they not at all make the difference between normal flash and HEF ?   
> Seems weird to me (but I'm not an expert)....
>
> Enjoy your Sunday
>
> Daiv
>
> Le dimanche 23 octobre 2022 à 13:11:27 UTC+2, Rob Hamerling a écrit :
>
>
> Hi RobJ and others,
>
> My assumption that HEF-size is always 128 comes from:
>
> https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/30010068G.pdf
>
> In the explanation colums it says:
>
> HEF: High–Endurance Flash 128B Non–volatile data storage with 
> high–endurance 100k E/W cycles
>
> It doesn't say if it is always in the highest program address region.
> Searching all datasheets isn't the favorite aspect of my hobby....
>
> As far as size of program memory concerns: the device file contain a 
> "pragma code", but I cannot find in the docs if there is a companion 
> built-in constant definition, for example like there is one for bank size: 
> "CONST target_bank_size = cexpr".   
> If such a constant doesn't exists yet it would be handy to add it to the 
> compiler.
>
> Regards, RobH
>
>
>
> -- 
> *Rob H*amerling, Vianen, NL
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/61cdd53e-398c-4c2d-8786-2762984b7e3an%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/61cdd53e-398c-4c2d-8786-2762984b7e3an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/02a30931-3dbe-4249-a3b2-4dcfe77aa78cn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/02a30931-3dbe-4249-a3b2-4dcfe77aa78cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/c55d7e89-c153-4847-a0f4-7d51669bc9afn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to