To be honest, in my application, I need 6 PWM signals.
Since they must be equivalent to one another, I will use some 16-bits 
modules but without those new features, and with a duty cycle defined with 
only the 10 MSB

So, as far as I am concerned, there is no need for a specific 16-bit PWM 
library *now*, but it would be a nice addition to the lib, just to keep its 
attractiveness in the future and avoid a technical debt when more and more 
PIC's will implement these new modules.   

(The same goes for the ADCC module, the new CLB module)

I cannot commit to write a specific library since I can never be sure to be 
ok with all of the rules of the style guide, not to be extensive in the 
funcitonnalities written, but I can offer to send here some libraries to 
serve as a starting point, if someone can review and amend them as needed.

Kr,

D.

Le jeudi 4 avril 2024 à 19:12:22 UTC+2, Rob CJ a écrit :

> Hi David,
>
> In 2022 I added PWM5 and PWM6 like the previous pwm's.
>
> What is foreseen is what is requested 🙂 (and there is a need for it).
>
> So it can be straight forward to add the 10-bit PWM 9 and PWM 10 but not 
> sure if there is a need for it.
>
> For the 16-bit I think we need a complete new library, something like 
> pwm16_hardware.jal and add more features. That may take quite some time. 
>
> Do you - or does anybody else - have plans to use the 16-bit pwm with all 
> its nice features?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *Van:* [email protected] <[email protected]> namens David VB <
> [email protected]>
> *Verzonden:* woensdag 3 april 2024 23:14
> *Aan:* jallib <[email protected]>
> *Onderwerp:* [jallib] PWM modules in PIC16F177* family 
>  
> Hi there,
>
> It appears that the PIC16F177* family have PWM modules named up to PWM12, 
> which is not foreseen in Jallib
>
> Example: PIC16F1777 or 1779 have:
> PWM3, PWM4, PWM9, PWM10 : 10 bits PWM modules
> PWM5, PWM6, PWM11, PWM12 : 16 bits PWM modules (with more functionnalities 
> as 10-bit modules, such as four offset modes, and different operation modes)
>
> Is there anything foreseen for those in Jallib ?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> David
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/ab0fbea9-025c-49bf-b37f-18159885fa2fn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/ab0fbea9-025c-49bf-b37f-18159885fa2fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/0a1fcd7f-71a5-4350-be8f-8c4f19d17d5an%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to