Lets take a closer look when 2.10 is released, and we've taken stock of the next milestones.
BioXSD has different, and somewhat broader aims than jalview's BioJSON. At a pinch they could interoperate, but we lack use cases. FYI: See twitter conversation: https://twitter.com/matuskalas/status/775296888870408192 [https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/620164526038720512/K_nZrhwo_400x400.jpg]<https://twitter.com/matuskalas/status/775296888870408192> Matúš Kalaš on Twitter<https://twitter.com/matuskalas/status/775296888870408192> twitter.com “@foreveremain Sounds good! The new bx|BioJSON|BioYAML is still a messy work in progress, so would be great to shape up its directions soon” ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Charles Ofoegbu (Staff) <[email protected]> Sent: 12 September 2016 14:41:43 To: Jalview Development List Subject: Re: [Jalview-dev] BioXSD's BioJSON - review/comparison with Jalview's 2.9's BioJSON needed Yes - this is exactly our idea with BioJSON<http://jalview.github.io/biojson/>. I’ve had a look at their schema, it is quite different from ours but we should certainly collaborate with them since we share the same vision. Charles Ofoegbu Tochukwu Charles Jalview Visual Analytics Developer/Scientist The Barton Group Division of Computational Biology School of Life Sciences University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK. Skype: cofoegbu www.jalview.org<http://www.jalview.org/> www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk<http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/>? On 12 Sep 2016, at 10:57, Geoff Barton <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Yes, important to look at this in detail. I examined Matus Kalas' thesis last year which included bioXSD and I know Inge Jonassen and his group well. They are major long-term users and supporters of Jalview so I am pretty sure will be keen to see their work on representation being relevant to Jalview. We can certainly work with these people to get a common representation that works well for Jalview. Geoff. On 12/09/2016 10:31, James Procter (Staff) wrote: Hi. I just saw BioXSD's poster on F1000 which describes their own 'BioJSON' format. From the abstract, it looks to accomplish pretty much exactly what I and Charles wanted for our own BioJSON spec. Charles - It would be really useful if you could take a look at their poster / docs to see whether we are 'compatible': http://f1000research.com/posters/5-2213 The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096 _______________________________________________ Jalview-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev -- Geoff Barton | Professor of Bioinformatics | Head of Division of Computational Biology School of Life Sciences | University of Dundee, Scotland, UK | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Tel: +44 1382 385860 | www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk<http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/> | twitter: @gjbarton The University of Dundee is registered Scottish charity: No.SC015096 The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096 _______________________________________________ Jalview-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096 The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
_______________________________________________ Jalview-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev
