Yes, trees in Jalview are calculated only based on marked positions.

For accuracy, I would not use phylogenetic tools from Jalview.

I would rather do the following:
1) Select the positions in Jalview.
2) Copy them.
3) Paste them as new alignment.
4) Save the alignment in a new file.

And then I use FastTree or RAxML (or even PhyML if you have access to good computer cluster).

Romain


On 05/11/2014 20:18, James Starlight wrote:
Hi Romain,

thank you very much for the explanation!
I've already used TrimAl as the part of the Phylemon2 server and found it very useful :-) Regarding calculating Trees in JalView using subset of the residues: as I noticed the tree are calculated just in case when the positions of ligand-contacting residues are marked by red color in the top, aren't it? Is it possible in addition to check on what exactly subset trees has been calculated based on the output results? Finally regarding accuracy of the calculation of the trees- what method should produce best results for the alignment consisted of several hundred of sequences?

James

2014-11-05 16:59 GMT+01:00 rstuder <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    Dear James,

    For aligning the sequences, I would recommend MAFFT (L-INS-i) or
    Clustal-Omega:
    http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/
    http://www.clustal.org/omega/

    Then, you can use Jalview to select manually the ligand-binding
    domain in your alignment.

    You can also use TrimAl to select only well aligned position that
    corresponding to phylogenetic signal.
    http://trimal.cgenomics.org/

    For producing the tree on very big alignments, I would recommend
    FastTree. It produces quite good results and is very easy to use:
    http://www.microbesonline.org/fasttree/

    There is also RAxML which is developed for big alignments:
    http://sco.h-its.org/exelixis/web/software/raxml/index.html

    Best regards,
    Romain


    On 05/11/2014 15:06, James Starlight wrote:
    Dear JalView users!

    I need to perform large-scale phylogenetic analysis of  big
    dataset of GPCR sequences selecting as the input only residues
    involved in the ligand-binding site of those receptors (taken
    from the structural data) from the input multiple-sequence
    alignment.  I wounder what method for phylogenetic trees
    calculation will be best (neighbourhood joining or pairs-distance
    calculations) for my task as well as how to make selection of the
    selecting residues properly (previously I've done it by
    cntrl-left click on the bottom of the alignment marking
    corresponded zone by red colour). On what additional details
    should I paid my attention during such calculations in case when
    I'm dealing with a very big number of sequences?


    Thank you for the help,

    James


    _______________________________________________
    Jalview-discuss mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-discuss


-- Romain Studer
    EMBL-EBI
    Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
    Hinxton
    Cambridgeshire
    CB10 1SD, UK
    Tel:+44 (0)1223 492 547  <tel:%2B44%20%280%291223%20492%20547>
    Twitter: @RomainStuder



--
Romain Studer
EMBL-EBI
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
Hinxton
Cambridgeshire
CB10 1SD, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1223 492 547
Twitter: @RomainStuder

_______________________________________________
Jalview-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-discuss

Reply via email to