Seems like Peer/Turbine is worth investigating. I'm happy to do a bit of
research into this - try and port the James/Town stuff to James/Peer.
Steve
http://www.runtime-collective.com
t: 01273 234290
f: 01273 234291
m: 0789 984 1684
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 5/8/01 11:17 AM, "Harmeet Bedi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FYI: 2 other open source ORM projects that could be interesting are
> > DODS from Enhydra http://dods.enhydra.org/
> > Castor from Exolab http://castor.exolab.org/
> >
> > Harmeet
>
> DODS, I don't know much about, but on the Enhydra.org site, they suggest
> they are moving to Osage.sourceforge.net which is *very* similar to Turbine
> Peer's and in fact used to be in Turbine's source tree, but the author
> didn't want to be in Turbine's shadow.
>
> Castor is ok, but it is bloated and does way to much. The Jetspeed project
> currently uses it but is moving away from it (probably towards Peers).
>
> So, the question would really be Peer's or Osage. I would choose to eat my
> own dog food. :-)
>
> -jon
>
> --
> If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
> your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
> <http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd.html>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
