Serge Knystautas wrote:
> 
> Two quick thoughts before I return to lurking...
> 
> 1. ESMTP support sounds great.  +1 to incorporating it.
> 
> 2. I've been thinking of going into the guts of James to reduce the use of a
> MimeMessage.
> 
> Really, the only time we *need* a MimeMessage object is during Mailet
> processing.  I remember adding code so that the Mail object only
> instantiates the MimeMessage if a mailet uses the MimeMessage, and this
> speeds things great, but I'm not sure what the state of that is now (whether
> it's only on the database repository or for all types of repositories or
> what).
> 
> The areas were we don't need MimeMessage at all are during SMTP receive,
> SMTP delivery, and POP retrieval.  We're using MimeMessage because it's a
> easy, but it'd be a lot more efficient (speed, memory, everything) if we
> were using streams to do this and possibly doing some small verification of
> the format.

+1 Agree completely

> 
> I don't really have time, but thought I'd bring this up if anybody else was
> thinking about it.

Alas, this also applies to me! There's also several other thing that
need sorting.

Charles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to