----- Original Message -----
From: "Harmeet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Proposal:
> - james.util.Lock should be renamed to james.util.LockMap. Expresses the
> intent better
+1
> - james.util.LockMap should reuse the avalon.excalibur.concurrent
> facilities.
+1 (but is it really so complicated as to need this dependency)
> - if it is useful to have james.util.LockMap outside James, maybe that
class
> or equivalent could be added to avalon.excalibur.concurrent.
Up to Avalon folks I guess.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
