On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 22:15, Gabriel Bucher wrote:
> Thanks Peter but it doesn't matter if you use the wait inside the
> synchronized block or not! I tried both! No chance! Any other ideas... If I
> use wait(1000), the process will finish.
> I'm using at the moment winnt4 and jdk 1.3.1

hmmm - may be something james specific then ... possibly there is a block 
that is starting a connection but not releasing it. Not sure will have a look.

-- 
Cheers,

Pete

----------------------------------------
Whatever you do will be insignificant, 
but it is very important that you do it. 
                              --Gandhi
----------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to