John Yoost wrote:
>
> I am very interested in using James SMTP and IMAP and the Database
> repository.
Hurrah!
>
> I realize that the IMAP implementation is pre-beta. I have looked at the
> existing code (for IMAP) as well as RFC2060. with the idea of helping with
> the IMAP part of the project.
Great.
>
> With a quick once over, it looks to me as if the IMAP code does not support
> the use of a database repository (or the other way around, the Database
> repository does not support the IMAP requirement). Speciffically I don't
> see any support for multiple folders in the database repository, only
> hard-coded support for folders under the OS file system.
I suspect that there are enough differences between IMAP and POP3 that
the existing database mail repositories are not a great place to start
for IMAP db storage.
>
> Am I off base here?
>
> Is this current limitation why IMAP development is at a stand-still?
No - I just haven't had any time recently.
>
> Please help me get my arms around where the IMAP development stands so I can
> try to help.
I would suggest getting first getting the IMAP + file storage up to
usable standard.
DB-ising should then be fairly straightforward.
Charles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
