John Yoost wrote: >All, > >I have been looking at the existing IMAP Server code for some time now, and >also RFC2060. > >At the risk of pissing someone off, I propose the following: > >I have started to rewrite the IMAP server portion. > >I want to take a different approach than was taken in the past. > >I would like to include all the functionality up-to the point that I can >using the existing generic repository (file or DB). > >When I get to the point of adding functionality that is not currently >supported by the repository I will request (or add myself) this >functionality to the repository code. > >In this way functionality such as ACL mailboxes, could be added as people >using clients that use this extention need it. (maybe never :)) > >The current version of the IMAP server has a ton of code to support it's own >repository. > Sounds like a reasonable plan to me. My peers have been requesting IMAP for some time. I have resisted because I like the elegance, simplicity, and light-weight footprint of James ( compared to a full installation of iPlanet Messaging server, yikes! ) As soon as you have a minimal working set of IMAP functionality , I would be happy to set up a test site at arielpartners.com
Thanks! --Craeg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
