So, Is a vote called for? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Knystautas [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 9:12 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: IMAP Server Revisited
> 
> I'm all for it.  My help has been sporadic for the past year, and Charles
> similarly (Charles being the major author of the IMAP code).  The IMAP
> code
> will make additional demands on the repositories, but I'd rather extend
> what
> we have than develop a separate set of repositories (I'd also like to see
> NNTP do the same, but don't have time and I can't even get the "main"
> repositories reliable :)
> 
> Also I'm getting more determined to move the IMAP code to a proposal as
> it's
> not ready, it's not getting active development, and it's confusing about
> what features James currently offers.
> 
> Ok, back to this pop3 repository problem...
> 
> Serge Knystautas
> Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites
> http://www.lokitech.com/
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Yoost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:05 PM
> Subject: IMAP Server Revisited
> 
> 
> > All,
> >
> > I have been looking at the existing IMAP Server code for some time now,
> and
> > also RFC2060.
> >
> > At the risk of pissing someone off, I propose the following:
> >
> > I have started to rewrite the IMAP server portion.
> >
> > I want to take a different approach than was taken in the past.
> >
> > I would like to include all the functionality up-to the point that I can
> > using the existing generic repository (file or DB).
> >
> > When I get to the point of adding functionality that is not currently
> > supported by the repository I will request (or add myself) this
> > functionality to the repository code.
> >
> > In this way functionality such as ACL mailboxes, could be added as
> people
> > using clients that use this extention need it. (maybe never :))
> >
> > The current version of the IMAP server has a ton of code to support it's
> own
> > repository.
> >
> >
> > Comments, flames, or Agreement requested.
> >
> > -John Yoost
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to