+1

----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 2:57 AM
Subject: RE: Version numbers...


> Should we vote on this?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:50 AM
> > To: James Developers List
> > Subject: Version numbers...
> >
> >
> > I'd like to propose that we use a version number system like that used
by
> > bugzilla, namely that the head of CVS have an even minor number and
> > milestone releases have the opposite, in addition "nightly" releases
would
> > have the same version number as the current CVS.
> >
> > Thus CVS is currently 2.0a2, when we make a milestone release it would
be
> > released as 2.0a3 and CVS would advance to 2.0a4, that way there
> > would be no
> > confusion between bugs reported against released versions and
> > bugs reported
> > against nightly builds/cvs.
> >
> > this is the explanation from bugzilla..
> >
> > "We only place tarballs of even-numbered minor versions on the FTP
server.
> > The installed version on bugzilla.mozilla.org (and the most recent CVS
> > version, which is a slightly newer version than the installed version)
> > always have an odd-numbered minor version. If you want to get exactly
the
> > code that mozilla.org is running, you're out of luck (they make internal
> > patches just like everyone else), but you can get pretty close by
> > using CVS,
> > and the minor version number will be odd. If you want a more
> > stable release,
> > you can use a tarball, and the minor version number will be even. "
> >
> > d.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to