Hello
In the present form this system invalidate the present identification
system. I prefer to give an acceptable solution to everyone if it is
possible, and make the complete work.
There is very simple to give alternate user naming system if the systems has
not to work simultaneously.
The solution I propose is adding one attribute more to the james-config.xml:
<servernames multidomain="true/false">
With this parameter each administrator can select one of the two user naming
systems. For each naming system the only difference is how the UserName
class works, mainly the equal, equalsIgnoreCase and toString methods.
Is this system acceptable?. If it is I will do the modifications and then
send the diffs.
Regards
Blas Rodriguez Somoza
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: Patch for multiple domains
> we'd be happy to consider your changes, send them to this list as diffs
> (either in seperate files or one big file)
> if your not sure how to do this read this:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html section marked "Patches"
>
> Do your diff from the src directory and ensure that you include the whole
> ouput from cvs diff including the lines that look like this:
>
> cvs diff -u java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/RemoteDelivery.java
> Index: java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/RemoteDelivery.java
> ===================================================================
> RCS file:
>
/home/cvs/jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/RemoteDe
> livery.java,v
> retrieving revision 1.14
> diff -u -r1.14 RemoteDelivery.java
> --- java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/RemoteDelivery.java 1 Mar 2002
> 15:58:40 -0000 1.14
> +++ java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/RemoteDelivery.java 7 Mar 2002
> 11:04:12 -0000
>
> This makes it easier for us to use "Patch" 'cos it allows it to find the
> files it needs to patch
>
> We've been talking around this subject for some while now, and have always
> stuck on the issue of user identification.
> I suspect that your scheme using mailaddresses as usernames may not be to
> everyones tastes, and therefore we ought to make sure that by making your
> scheme operational it doesn't preclude any other naming schemes, including
> the current one.
>
> d.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Blas Rodriguez Somoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:38 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Patch for multiple domains
> >
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm testing james to use it as my mail server. I see that presently
> > there is no real support for domains, so I get the code from CVS
> > and try to
> > make the changes to allow domains.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
