Yes it does, but James already changes the name several times in the course of processing a message so I didn't think this was introducing anything new.
Steve -----Original Message----- From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:00 PM To: James Developers List Subject: Re: Found Problem with Retries and Bounces Your patch changed the mail's name, which has a meaning for the application, to work around a bug in *one* of the storage mechanisms. I would much rather fix the storage mechanism than add your patch and otherwise leave future developers to worry about this kind of stuff. -- Serge Knystautas Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites http://www.lokitech.com/ Steve Short wrote: > This is essentially what the patch I mailed in does, it saves to a new file > and then deletes the old file. I don't really see any benefit to copying > back over the original file. I don't know what mail.dir does. > > Regards > Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:33 PM > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: Found Problem with Retries and Bounces > > > Steve, > > This is a good point... although I've patched the FileRepository so that > it does properly not save over itself and obliterate the mime message, > it does still leave your point as valid (about it not being on disk for > a bit of time). Perhaps I should save to a temp file and then delete > the old copy and copy the temp over it. Doesn't mail.dir do something > like this where it documents how it saves to a new file and copies the > temp over the original? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
