In the MimeMessageInputStreamSource class (under james/core), instead of first storing the message from the inputstream (SMTP input stream) to a temp file & then buffering it out, what if we buffer it out directly from the input stream? That way we can avoid 1 disk i/o and also not have to store the data in memory thus avoiding the danger of an errant sender choking memory. I tried out this approach & seems to work in my test. Does anyone see any potential risk or danger in doing this?
Shilpa -----Original Message----- From: Shilpa Dalmia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:09 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: All incoming mails written to temp file before spooling Does anyone know why all incoming mails in James are first written to a temp file before writing to the spool? Why not instead just keep it in memory? Its a performance bottleneck. Check the constructor for MimeMessageInputStreamSource. Shilpa Dalmia -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
