not at all, I must've misunderstood, I thought you were reluctant to comit the changes without testing them thouroughly.. and that a branch would mean we could all test them for you. As far as I care, if you believe that it works thats good enough for me. d.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 01 June 2002 18:05 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: Serviceable to Composable changeover > > > Danny, > > Me? Hey dude, my plan was to get the fix right. Right in so far as I am > currenty testing with Mail & News clients..... > Barring issues of atomicity ( are we all waiting for > http://subversion.tigris.org/ ? ), it should work perfectly when you > folks next 'update' > > However if you'de prefer branch, I'll blow the dust off my O'Rielly CVS > book ;-) > > Regards, > > - Paul > > >Just to start things off my +1 is for a short-lived branch. > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: 01 June 2002 17:31 > >>To: James Developers List > >>Subject: RE: Serviceable to Composable changeover > >> > >> > >>if you want to you could either submit patches which we could test, > >>or we could create a temporary branch to test this change, > >>or we could trust you.. > >> > >>Votes anyone? > >>d. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>-- > >>>All of these are pending of course. Pending for wisdom from Peter > >>>Donald, and pending given they have exceeded my remit somewhat and > >>>require consent before pushing back. > >>> > >>>- Paul > >>> > >>> > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
