Danny Angus wrote: >>Agreed. However, as to your point of hosting it on a separate website, >>before I donated my code for James, it was sitting on a usershare, never >>to be looked at. James has great visibility, and until we either find a >>more public way to get exposure independent of the code, I think this is >>the best place for it. That said, I think it's important to state the >>separation as an important design decision (along with other design >>notes that could stand to be documented). >> > > > I totally agree with all of that Serge, > I wasn't suggesting we do anything more drastic than to visibly and > brand-wise sub-divide the James site, perhaps eventually petition the PMC > for Mailet to be made a full sub-project.
Cool, yeah it also would be great just to write up the design goals and why we made certain decisions. Also it lets us figure out when we need to make changes (like the matcher config or whatever else). -- Serge Knystautas Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites http://www.lokitech.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
