Peter M. Goldstein wrote:
>Stephen and Danny,
>
>One issue is discussed in bug #9628. That bug fundamentally came down
>to case sensitivity for Booleans in the Avalon AbstractConfiguration
>class. From what I've read on the Avalon-dev mailing list, I believe
>that issue has been resolved in Avalon.
>
>
That's correct - any of the following values are valid boolean arguments
in a configuration:
true, false
yes, no
on, off
1, 0
Evaluation is case insensitive.
Cheers, Steve.
>--Peter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 11:49 AM
>To: James Developers List
>Subject: RE: Avalon feedback request
>
>Jeeze, where to start.. I'd suggest you trawl our archive & bugzilla,
>I'll
>remember them sooner or later, but most likely later.
>I'll be sure to let you know what I do remember when it comes to me..
>:-)
>
>d.
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 27 July 2002 17:41
>>To: James Developers List
>>Subject: Avalon feedback request
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Danny Angus wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>I imagine that others on this mailing list have their own wish
>>>>
>>>>
>lists. I
>
>
>>>>recognize that this list is ambitious, which is why I'd like to see
>>>>
>>>>
>a
>
>
>>>>larger committer base. A larger base would also make it less likely
>>>>that all the committers would be absent from participation in the
>>>>discussion lists at any given time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Not really absent just busy with other things.
>>>The traditional route to becoming a commiter is to contribute
>>>
>>>
>>code/patches
>>
>>
>>>and then to be proposed and elected by the comitters.
>>>I'm sure you'd see more activity here, even from commiters, if you
>>>
>>>
>were
>
>
>>>instigating discussions, submitting code and improving the product.
>>>
>>>One thing James currently lacks is a clear release plan for the
>>>
>>>
>>next cycle,
>>
>>
>>>it is suffering from a number of avalon inspired deficiencies
>>>
>>>
>>and there have
>>
>>
>>>been murmurings about moving away from avalon. I believe that the
>>>
>>>
>head of
>
>
>>>CVS would not be as safe to use as v2.0.3 but have not had time to
>>>
>>>
>drive
>
>
>>>forward the changes needed, assuming they are within James not
>>>
>>>
>phoenix.
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>Hi Danny:
>>
>>Could you, and/or perhaps other people on this list, provide more
>>detail the issues you have found concerning resources from the Avalon
>>community. Are these Avalon-Framework issues, Avalon-Phoenix issues,
>>Avalon-Logkit issues, or issues related to one of the many sub-systems
>>within the Avalon-Excalibur project? Just for reference - I am a
>>committer over on Avalon and I would like to understand what the
>>
>>
>issues
>
>
>>are and ensure that constructive feedback gets back to th Avalon
>>commnity - if that's appropriate. Aside from being a committer on
>>Avalon, I am also responsible for a large number of commercial
>>
>>
>business
>
>
>>and service management components (B2B collaboration, process
>>management, etc.) and I would like to get a better picture about the
>>potential integration of James into that framework.
>>
>>Cheers, Steve.
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>Stephen J. McConnell
>>
>>OSM SARL
>>digital products for a global economy
>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>http://www.osm.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>
>>
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
