> -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Yeah, I agree. I never quite understood how SMTP AUTH was > implemented > effectively because there isn't an easy way to do that. I > don't know... > maybe add an "X-" header to the message itself to record that it's > authenticated (and make sure there isn't one there already). In other implementations such as qmail is a list of all IP Addresses that are authenticated. After one hour the IP Adresses will be deleted - could this be used in James ? Sorry, I don't know the AUTH Impl. of James at this time.
- RE: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Noel J. Bergman
- RE: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Peter M. Goldstein
- Re: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Serge Knystautas
- RE: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Noel J. Bergman
- Re: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Serge Knystautas
- [VOTE] Changes to database ta... Noel J. Bergman
- RE: [VOTE] Changes to databas... Danny Angus
- String=>StringBuffer Peter M. Goldstein
- Re: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Harmeet Bedi
- RE: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Peter M. Goldstein
- RE: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Sascha Kulawik
- RE: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Noel J. Bergman
- RE: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Sascha Kulawik
- RE: Open relay with SMTP-AUTH Sascha Kulawik
- [VOTE] new commiter - Peter M Goldstein Danny Angus
- Re: [VOTE] new commiter - Peter M Goldstein Serge Knystautas
- Re: [VOTE] new commiter - Peter M Goldstein Charles Benett
- Ways to authorize mail relay Noel J. Bergman
