Sascha Kulawik wrote: > Hello Danny, > > Thats everybodys own opinion if some features are useful or not. For me > it's my main interest, because I want to kill my Exchange Server and > want an IMAP Server "under my own control". Currently implemented IMAP > Servers are most developed under C and I like OOP - so what :) > Ok, I think it's much work, today I've revieved the James Code and are > afraid to say, that some of the Classes looks like "krauts". It's really > hard to find the right Components, also there is no standarizied naming > convention for the classes. > Example: I've seen the Interface UsersStore under services and wanted to > see the implemented Class for that. And AvalonUsersStore seems for me > not as the right name for an Impl Class. Could be, that's a correct name > (and it's because my bad knowledge of Avalon / Phoenix). > Ok, enough for that :)
There was a plan to turn UsersStore into an Avalon/ Phoenix block as it is probably a component that many non-James servers could use. Hence the name (I think). Charles -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
