I wrote, > >But the point of Gump is that it tests the domain level build by building > >every part of the domain from scratch. Steve replied, > Which from my point of view is the really valuble thing
Mine too, as a newcomer to the ideas of domain engineering I can totally subscribe to the principles of Gump, and seeing Avalon as a provider of domain commonalities, and James as an expression of variability, I can see how the domain level build testing of Gump would help accelerate the handling of James/Avalon issues. I'm not sure what to do about Gump/James, but I do know where to start poking around.. d. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
