In the interest of stability, I'd suggest releasing it with IMAP turned off and those that want it can enable it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 5:46 AM
To: James Developers List
Subject: RE: What do we need to release 2.1?
> My impression what I look at James from the Merlin perspective is that
> James is actualy made up of a number of reusable components - and DNS
> sever, SMTP server, mail reposirtory, NNTP server, etc. IMAP is just
> another component. The point I'm getting at is that it could be
> usefull to look at James in terms of its component parts - start
> qualifying these in terms of stability,
We already do this, but not versioning.
and IMHO it is perfectly acceptable to release James with unstable alpha IMAP, and stable other protocols, because users who don't want IMAP can turn it off.
d.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
