Thats the lines I was thinking along.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew C. Oliver
> Sent: 28 August 2002 13:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IMAP - Append Command
> 
> 
> Personally, I think we should look for a way to componentize JAMES far 
> enough to where building in IMAP is as simple as flicking a switch so 
> that there is no need for a divergent versions of things.
> 
> -Andy
> 
> Danny Angus wrote:
> > Sascha,
> > 
> > I'm happy to work with you to get these changes in, then to 
> assess IMAP and
> > propose a vote if it appears to be half way stable,
> > but
> > 1/ please could you help me by making your patches conform to 
> the guidelines
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/james/contribute.html
> > diff -u from the /proposals/imap dir, and zip new files from 
> there too. Then
> > I don't have to work out paths, and go looking for files to patch.
> > 
> > and
> > 2/ Perhaps if I add a task to the main build file that will 
> build James with
> > IMAP that would be a reasonable interim before we put it back 
> into the HEAD.
> > 
> > d.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to