> Why isn't the handling consistent? Probably because this is an Open Source project, and any number of different people have any number of different ideas.
> And while I'm on the subject, > why don't > we instrument both LocalDelivery and RemoteDelivery to accept an > (optional) > processor name for delivery errors, so that people can write > their own error > handling mailets? You tell me? d. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
