Sascha,
> what is missing for getting IMAP in the Main Trunk > by default as disabled > (and maked unstable) ? IMHO the following issues need to be addressed before we can vote the IMAP code into the main branch: i) Conclusive summary of what does and does not work that can be posted on the web site. This will enable the user community to evaluate it for their needs and the developer community to determine what needs addressing ii) Proper documentation of the code in line with code submission guidelines (basically, Javadoc everything). This is noticeably lacking. Hence the code is currenty in violation of Jakarta code guidelines. Personally, I'm a stickler for this one. iii) Merge with the 2.1 code base. Once 2.1 is code frozen, relevant changes (changes to James.java, service structure related to Andrei's changes) wil need to be merged in. iv) Release of 2.1 - basically the IMAP code hasn't received the attention required over the course of August/September to be included in the 2.1 release (which I'm proposing for October) --Peter __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
