----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 1:17 AM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepository JDBCMailRepository.java
> pgoldstein 2002/10/04 01:17:50 > > Modified: src/java/org/apache/james/util/mordred JdbcDataSource.java > src/java/org/apache/james/nntpserver NNTPHandler.java > src/java/org/apache/james/nntpserver/repository > ArticleIDRepository.java NNTPArticleImpl.java > NNTPGroup.java NNTPGroupImpl.java > NNTPRepositoryImpl.java NNTPSpooler.java > src/java/org/apache/james/userrepository > AbstractJdbcUsersRepository.java > src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepository > JDBCMailRepository.java > Removed: src/java/org/apache/james/nntpserver LISTGroup.java > src/java/org/apache/james/nntpserver/repository > NNTPUtil.java > Log: > Rearranged object encapsulation for several classes in the NNTP server code One of the problems with this checkin is that that each person has his/her own views. I don't think recent changes are bad. James is now moving better than in past, but an overall standard way or an exchange on what should be the right way may be better. If each person decides to refactor/rearchitect on instinct or even in response to terrible issues, it would be a bit of loop assuming any software would have issues and will(hopefully) outlive it's develepers. my 2 cents. Harmeet -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
