I do get a vote. :)
+1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:13 PM > To: James-Dev Mailing List > Subject: [VOTE] Interface for resettable, time-guarded, operations > > The question is: shall we adopt the Watchdog interface with a choice of > using either a dual or shared thread implementation? Advantages of the > change have already been presented, and include: > > 1) Supports both dual-thread and shared-thread implementations. > 2) Provides a standalone, reusable service that can be used in > non-Avalon situations. I would suggest that we can donate > the code, so to speak, to Jakarta-Commons. This is a very > useful, and oft-needed, facility. > 3) Can easily be unit tested outside of an Avalon container. > > The code has already been written to make this change, so there is little > effort to adopt the vote. I don't see any downside to adopting this > interface, and because it allows the choice of either implementation, both > "camps" should be satisfied. Both Harmeet and Peter have told me, > personally, that they appreciate my efforts to mediate the issue. This is > my best proposal. > > I don't get a vote (and I am really beginning to regret that), but my > non-vote is +1. > > --- Noel > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
