I don't get a vote either, but my non-vote is +1. > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:13 PM > To: James-Dev Mailing List > Subject: [VOTE] Interface for resettable, time-guarded, operations > > > The question is: shall we adopt the Watchdog interface with a > choice of using either a dual or shared thread > implementation? Advantages of the change have already been > presented, and include: > > 1) Supports both dual-thread and shared-thread implementations. > 2) Provides a standalone, reusable service that can be used in > non-Avalon situations. I would suggest that we can donate > the code, so to speak, to Jakarta-Commons. This is a very > useful, and oft-needed, facility. > 3) Can easily be unit tested outside of an Avalon container. > > The code has already been written to make this change, so > there is little effort to adopt the vote. I don't see any > downside to adopting this interface, and because it allows > the choice of either implementation, both "camps" should be > satisfied. Both Harmeet and Peter have told me, personally, > that they appreciate my efforts to mediate the issue. This > is my best proposal. > > I don't get a vote (and I am really beginning to regret > that), but my non-vote is +1. > > --- Noel > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:james-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
