Sorry out of context ignore the last email. I ment to send
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter M. Goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > - I don't think refactoring is needed. There are ways of addressing > > configuration overhead with current structure. > > You haven't proposed one. I gave reasons why your suggestions were > erroneous, and you haven't addressed any of them. I'll post it asap. As you can probably tell, my hands are full. :) Harmeet PS: copy paste mistake, a bit sleepy. will do in a couple of days. Sorry Peter if this is not fast enough for you, but a quality response with patches and ideas takes time. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harmeet Bedi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: Re: Peter, Harmeet > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter M. Goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I've explained over and over why Danny encountered the issue he did. I > > don't see why the point needs to be belabored again. > > > > > - I don't think refactoring is needed. There are ways of addressing > > > configuration overhead with current structure. > > I'll post it asap. As you can probably tell, my hands are full. :) > > Harmeet -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
