Nevermind... you guys got a lot done this weekend and are ahead of me on this. Sounds great.
Serge Knystautas Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites http://www.lokitech.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Serge Knystautas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:08 AM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/testing BaseTest.java Main.java POP3Test.java TestMethod.java runtest.bat runtest.sh testconf.xml > Man, I go on vacation for 6 days and you guys send me like 500 emails on > james-dev. :) > > I agree with Harmeet that more testing is better, and I agree with Peter > that this isn't the place for it. > > I would +1 adding the testing code immediately where Harmeet left it and > +++1 a task for someone to build a series testing architecture, and in doing > that move this code to that separate directory and build task. > > I propose we build a separate directory (test/ next to src/) that holds > JUnit and other tests that can verify individual components, the entire > application, the default conf file, and whatever else. Each of us should be > able to run a script that does a clean build to make sure what we check into > CVS doesn't break anything. I know it's the ideal and we're a long way from > that, but the code could really use it. I would recommend creating this in > a separate directory rather than branch or tree (since we want to keep this > in CVS tree) and not in the proposals directory since testing should be core > and always available. > > Serge Knystautas > Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites > http://www.lokitech.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
