----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > BaseConnectionHandler is a misnomer, it is not part of the abstraction (as > seen in the code), and it is vestigial. Therefore it is unnecessary now, > and should there be some common implementation determined in the future, it > could be added by either inheritance or delegation without changing the > abstraction.
The idea was to pull in common handler code in a base class. Was not and is not used much and dosen't add much value today. There is however commonality across handlers that could pushed in base class. For instance socket related variables or common cleanup code. It may be an under used but useful abstraction. Would be ok to cleanup or could be useful to have around even if it doesn't do much. Don't you expect some common code to exist in each handler ? Harmeet -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
