> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Webb [mailto:jw@;inovem.com] > I've noticed in the past (and at the moment) that James is very fussy > about SMTP syntax for email addresses (MAIL TO etc). Although this is > not a significant problem, Qmail has a much better outlook on life:
Jason, Can you possibly make a list of acceptable but malformed addresses that James should accept but does not. Would be best to do it as a script like # SMTP protocol session to test for invalid addresses. S: 220.* C: HELO foobar S: 250.* C: MAIL FROM: <test@localhost> S: 250.* #good address C: RCPT TO: <test1@localhost> S: 250.* #bad address but accepted by some server but not James C: RCPT TO: test2@localhost S: 250.* C: QUIT S: 221.* We could fire off against specific server implementations and James to figure out, match and validate the correct behavior. Harmeet -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
