> What is your opinion re James as a top-level project?
Roy T. Fielding's message paints a completely different picture than that
presented, or at least understood by me from earlier messages. His message
suggests that it was always the intent for projects to form a PMC as they
matured, and that this is for legal reasons completely unrelated to any
reorganization of the Jakarta site, or other issue previously raised.
Based upon Roy T. Fielding's message, I think that it would be foolish NOT
to form a PMC. Any issues of site reorganization are completely orthogonal
to the legal issue of forming a PMC.
Since there is no other project under which we would properly be subsumed,
we clearly SHOULD form a PMC. So +1 on the PMC.
Many thanks for Nico for the clarification.
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
