Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Nicola,Thanks for your changes. Here are some additional specifics for your consideration:
good :-)
Hmmm, given that it has a 3dish look it doesn't play well with the rest of the skin... why do you prefer it? Maybe because it's long till the end of the page, or because it doesn't have a space on its left?- I prefer the left flush menu area from http://www.apache.org/~danny/
- I like the indented menu layout from http://www.krysalis.org/centipede/beta3/
Ok.
;-) I wanted to keep the skin more visually lightweight; I'll fix up something with more solid looking table headers.- I still prefer the section headings from http://www.apache.org/~danny/
Rounded corners are there now http://www.krysalis.org/centipede/beta3/- I'm ambivalent about the "tabs", but if they are going to be there, I'd prefer to see them look more like tabs (overlapped appearance and rounded corners).
As for overlapping, I think it's more a hastle to do than the effect for now.
- I like a > b > c nav in http://www.krysalis.org/centipede/beta3/
Cool.
We can talk about colors after you look these others over. :-)
Yup, exactly.
Well, the krysalis look is taken from the Forrest look http://xml.apache.org/forrest/ If you look at the two they are basically identical except for the font sizes and headings.What is the current status of proposing a site-wide look? The look you have in Krysalis is rather different from the basic Apache/Jakarta look, or the similar look used on the current Avalon site.
The krysalis skin is a tentative to make the forrest skin better, and most of the changes will reflect to the forrest skin, thus impacting on incubator.apache.org, xml.apache.org and commons.apache.org.
We are making a CSS-only version of it, and probably that will have a wider adoption still.
--- Noel -----Original Message----- From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:41 To: James Developers List Subject: Re: Forrest-made James test site - sneak preview Noel J. Bergman wrote:Nicola, What options exist to make it look more visually appealing? Maybe it is just me, but when I compare the Forrest-made test site to Danny'sMaven-madetest site at http://jakarta.apache.org/~danny/, I prefer the look of the latter. Specifics: - I prefer the smaller font size - I prefer the narrower menu, leaving a wider main area, and less scrolling - I prefer having section headings - The intra-page section anchors are nice, but not at the expense of everything else. YMMV, but those are my immediate visual responses. And I am assuming that all of that is tunable. Please compare the two sites, and let me knowwhatyou think. :-)I think you have good points. Actually, based on feedback from you guys and others, I've reworked the forrest skin to match better your visual expectations. Take a look here http://www.krysalis.org/centipede/beta3/ and see if it's better. This skin could also be a visual reference for the new forrest skin we're doing in pure CSS or used as such with color scheme modifications.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
