As a developer
---------------
Please, get this F***ing 2.1 release out of the door.
It works very well with a DB, just disable the filesystem repos and mark them as "unstable" or something. Then get a 2.1.1 release out right after.
Release early - release often.
And please, let's stop this thread. It's not constructive and has a stupid header that is simply wrong and unfair to you all.
Also, sorry if my mails on mirroring stirred up things, it was not my intention.
As a user
---------------
Please, get this F***ing 2.1 release out of the door. ;-)
And get 2.1.1 our *right after*.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- RE: There is no active development on Jam... Peter M. Goldstein
- Re: There is no active development on... Serge Knystautas
- RE: There is no active developme... Danny Angus
- RE: There is no active developme... Peter M. Goldstein
- Re: There is no active devel... Serge Knystautas
- RE: There is no active devel... Peter M. Goldstein
- RE: There is no active development on... Danny Angus
- RE: There is no active developme... Peter M. Goldstein
- Re: There is no active devel... Serge Knystautas
- RE: There is no active devel... Peter M. Goldstein
- Re: Release 2.1 Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: Release 2.1 Stephen McConnell
- RE: There is no active devel... Danny Angus
- RE: There is no active devel... Noel J. Bergman
- RE: There is no active devel... Noel J. Bergman
- RE: There is no active development on James Noel J. Bergman
- RE: There is no active development on James Dejan Nenov
- Re: There is no active development on James Stefano Debenedetti
- RE: There is no active development on James Rollo, Dan
- RE: There is no active development on James Aaron . Knauf
- RE: There is no active development on James Chris Means
