Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The attached patch was sent to me by private e-mail this morning. I am told
that it fixes a defect in the optional XOVER command.
If the NNTP specification requires that the article number prefix the XOVER
response, then we can post this patch. I don't know if it addresses
Harmeet's recent allegations, since they were never made specific.
+0 [I don't use James NNTP yet, and I can't test this code from where I am,
but I am willing to post it]
--- Noel
Heh, is this a majority or a consensus vote? :)
If it's a majority, then I'll -1. If it's consensus, then -0.
--
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites
http://www.lokitech.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
