serge - does this mean that the comparissions that arron mentioned are invalidtaed ?? or, in what fashion is the cache in James being perfromed; i.e. when does it get refreshed, etc.
alan > Hi Aaron, > > Small correction. > Actually , James caches DNS lookups as well :-) > > Serge > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aaron Knauf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:58 AM > Subject: Re: DNS Lookups taking too long > > > > > > > > Kwirirai wrote: > > > Hi Guys > > > I have recently tested out the time it takes to do DNS > > > lookups for James 2.1 release , > > > what I have released it seems to be taking too long > > > for MX record lookups to be done. > > > On average estimate, it takes about two minutes to > > > do the lookups . Is there a way that these lookups can > > > be tuned so that the lookups can take a much shorter > > > time, or does this depend on the network one is using > > > to the lookups , or there is some configuration that > > > needs to be done to make it go fast. I have used > > > nslookup from windows 2000 to lookup records on the > same machine running James > > > Win2K caches it's DNS lookups. AFAIK JAMES doesn't. > > This would tend to invalidate the comparison unless care > > was taken to ensure that the cache was emptied by > restarting the Win2K DNS client service. > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For > additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alan Gerhard Gerhard Computing, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
