On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:10, Christian Myrvold wrote: > G'day Darrell, > > Sounds good, I'll have a peak at the imap2 proposal. Then I can ask you > for help when needed. > > I think it would be nice to have IMAP storage for the 2.x version. Is > the current mail storage preventing this? > > - Christian
Yep, the current mail storage doesn't give the basic functionality we need, like flag persistence, hierarchical mailboxes and searching. To get IMAP working with James2, we'll need an IMAP storage mechanism that is back-compatible with the current mechanism (in some way), so that SMTP can deliver to an "inbox" which is accessible both as a POP3 repository and a mailbox within the IMAP mailbox structure. -- ciao, Daz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
