Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It maybe of interest to people here that I am I working on a container
and part of the requirements I aim to fulfill it to provide a complete
solution to the Mailet container scenario.
Well, of course we're interested. I'm just not sure what, if anything, to take away from your comments regarding what we need to do in terms of James v3 design and implementation.
1. stop being paranoid about dependencies 2. think about users and what they want 3. containers are about delivering value to users 4. there is a lot of scope that we can deal with 5. most of that scope is a container concern 6. if the spec if good then containment solution will be transparent 7. transparence isn't so easy 8. I'm willing and able to contribute to the work 9. just wanted to have more than eight points ;-) Cheers, Steve. -- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
