[Noel]
No, it really isn't a good point. Please think about it. It is actually a
spectacularly bad idea, and I say that as someone who likes JNDI.


Jesus - you don't pull any punches do you Noel?. You seem to have fairly strong views on this subject. I don't.

As I mentioned before - JNDI is generally used in a write occasionally, read often scenario. It is optimized toward this. JNDI is not /designed/ for high volume write access.
Nor, however, is JavaMail. JavaMail is designed as the client end of the equation - not for high throughput. In attempting to write our own service provider we may run into scalability problems.

Not having written a service provider for either of these API's before, I do not know how easy it would be to achieve our requirements.

Neither of these is a silver bullet. Until we have found the silver bullet, it might be better not to throw anything out?

ADK



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to