I've been using it for a couple of weeks now with no problems... I am in the process of moving it into proposals and changing it's name to fetchmail as the final step... I will try and wrap it up and submit it by end of day Tuesday... Does this work?
-leoD On 2/2/03 12:04 PM, "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Just wondering what is happening with the new Fetch[Message|Mail|Whatever] > service. I was under the impression that it was coming soon, and included > Sergei's changes, so I didn't merge Sergei's patch to FetchPOP. > > As you've likely seen on the mailing list, discussion seems to be converging > on using JavaMail for message stores, so between the fetcher, IMAP and the > message stores, we should be seeing a lot more use of JavaMail in James. I > just wrote an e-mail to Chris Burdess asking about his JavaMail providers. > > So if this thing is reasonable stable, I'd like to see about getting it into > HEAD. People who need the really stable tested code should be living out of > the v2.1 branch, anyway, right now. > > By the way, please take a look at this message on james-user@ from Sami > Siren, who packaged a fetch for DAV mail: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED] > e.org&msgId=548521 > > Seems to me that you'd want to subsume that code and config into the general > fetcher service. > > --- Noel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Leo D'Angelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 12:24 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: [Proposal] FetchPOP --> Fetch > > Hi All, > > I am happy to move the new version to proposals (and provide instructions). > Is was planning on doing something similar to the imap/imap2 implementation > in proposals (with docs). Would this be acceptable? > > I have tried Yahoo (works fine), a couple of third party POP implementations > (the javamail one does not allow the SEEN flag to be set) as well as mbox... > All these seemed to work fine... Extensive testing needs to be done on this > module but the basics *seem* to work... > > I was also thinking about FetchMail. The one thing that tripped me up is > that there is an nntp transport available... I thought someone could use > this as a "news feeder" as well... Any thoughts? > > -LeoD > > On 1/20/03 8:06 AM, "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Serge, >> >> Are you prepared to provide instructions to people on how to do a James >> build that has Fetch in proposals/? >> >> How stable is the revised version? Have you tried using any of the third >> party service providers, e.g., the ones for Yahoo and Hotmail? >> >> As for the name, I was kind of leaning towards something a bit more >> descriptive, e.g., FetchMail, but more generic than FetchPOP. >> >> --- Noel >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Serge Sozonoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 15:51 >> To: James Developers List >> Subject: [Proposal] FetchPOP --> Fetch >> >> Hi guys, >> >> After an email exchange with Leo, we would like to work on a new version > of >> FetchPOP in the proposals area and then move it into a futur release of >> James when it is ready. >> >> One of the main goals is to make full use of JavaMail so that we can take >> advatage of the various Javamail service providers. >> >> We would also like to rename FetchPOP to something else, maye just call it >> Fetch. >> >> Thanks, >> Sergei > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > S/MIME message build with a trial version of the Javamail S/MIME Toolkit. http://www.vroyer.org/smimetoolkit/
smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature
